Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Calls for papers’ Category

APPEL A COMMUNICATIONS
COLLOQUE “FOUCAULT FACE A LA NORME”

Faculté de droit d’Orléans, Jeudi 15 et vendredi 16 novembre 2018

Le colloque “Foucault face à la norme” s’inscrit dans une série de colloques ambitionnant de questionner un auteur, sa trajectoire de vie autant que son oeuvre, sur la question des normes telle qu’elle se pose avec acuité dans nos sociétés contemporaines.

Enjeux.
La pensée de Foucault intéresse les juristes depuis son début. Interrogée maintes fois sous l’angle de la politique, du droit et plus particulièrement du droit pénal, l’oeuvre de Foucault est féconde pour la théorie du droit. Maintenant bien connue des spécialistes, elle laisse entrevoir son potentiel sur la question spécifique de l’évolution démesurée des normes tant privées que publiques dans nos sociétés. Tout l’enjeu de cette interrogation nouvelle consisterait alors à confronter l’oeuvre de Michel Foucault à la problématique des normes au-delà des disciplines. C’est dans ce décloisonnement que pourra le mieux être cerné l’originalité de sa pensée et surtout son caractère fécond pour la théorie du droit.

• Foucault peut-il offrir un cadre de pensée à la théorie du droit en prise avec la concurrence des autres normativités contemporaines, notamment celles de l’éthique, de la technologie numérique, du management, et de la gestion ?
• Existe-il en ce sens un concept foucaldien de la norme à même de mettre en dialogue ces normativités concurrentes et propre à dégager des enseignements pour un renouveau de la théorie du droit ?
• Dans quelle mesure la pensée de Foucault peut-elle nous aider à comprendre et agir sur le développement exponentiel des normes de toute nature que connaissent nos sociétés occidentales ?
• Son engagement politique et personnel durant sa vie dessine-t-il également une posture face à la norme susceptible de nous guider en tant que chercheur et citoyen ?

Perspectives.
Déjà initiée avec Roland Barthes (https://www.upicardie.fr/barthesvsnorme/), cette série de colloques se poursuit avec Michel Foucault sous le même format : un colloque interdisciplinaire et international sur deux jours réunissant des spécialistes de l’auteur toute discipline confondue et des juristes intéressés par faire le lien avec la théorie du droit. Ce questionnement de certains des auteurs les plus inspirants du XXe siècle, qui se poursuivra avec Deleuze et Derrida notamment, dessine des voies possibles de contournement, de lutte et d’affranchissement face à la norme. La série de colloques Face à la norme s’inscrit dans le thème de recherche sur la Mutation des normes du Centre de recherche juridique Pothier de l’Université d’Orléans et de l’axe de recherche Technique(s) et histoire de la norme du Centre de Droit Privé et de Sciences Criminelles de l’Université d’Amiens.

Les propositions, en anglais ou en français et limitées à 500 mots, sont à envoyer à l’adresse foucaultvsnorme@u-picardie.fr avant le 31 janvier 2018

CALL FOR PAPERS SYMPOSIUM FOUCAULT FACES THE NORM
Faculty of Law of Orleans, Thursday 15 and Friday 16 November 2018

ISSUES
Foucault’s thought has interested lawyers since its start. Frequently questioned from the point of view of politics, law and more particularly of criminal law, Foucault’s work is fruitful for the Law theory. Now well known to specialists, it reveals its potential on the specific issue of the disproportionate development of both private and public standards in our societies. Then, the challenge of this new question would be to confront Michel Foucault’s work with the problematic of norms above disciplines. This is in this departitioning that the originality of his thought, and especially his fertile character for the theory of law could be best determined.
¥ Can Foucault offer a framework of thought to the theory of law in competition with other contemporary normativities, in particular those of ethics, digital technology, and management?
¥ Is there, in this sense, a Foucauldian concept of the norm capable of putting into dialogue these competing normativities, and which could provide lessons for a renewal of the law theory ?
¥ To what extent can Foucault’s thought help us understand and act on the exponential development of norms of all kinds that our Western societies are experiencing?
¥ Does his lifelong political and personal commitment also draw a posture to the norm that can guide us as a researcher and a citizen?

PROSPECTS
The Foucault symposium facing the norm is part of a series of conferences confronting an author to the problematic of standard. Already initiated with Roland Barthes (https://www.u-picardie.fr/barthesvsnorme/), this series continues with this symposium devoted to Michel Foucault, which reiterates the same format: an interdisciplinary and international two-day symposium bringing together specialists of the author in all disciplines and lawyers interested in making the link with the law theory. The prospect of this series of conferences, which will continue with Deleuze, Derrida, Levinas, and then Bourdieu, outlines possible ways of bypassing, struggling, and emancipating from the norms, thought and lived by some of the most inspiring authors of the twentieth century. The series of conferences Facing the norm is part of the research theme on the mutation of norms of the Pothier Legal Research Center of the University of OrlŽans and of the Research Focus Technique(s) and history of the norm of the Center of Private Law and Criminal Sciences of the University of Amiens.

Proposals, in English or French and limited to 500 words, should be sent to foucaultvsnorme@u-picardie.fr before January 31, 2018

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

CALL FOR PAPERS
The eighteenth annual meeting of the Foucault Circle

John Carroll University
University Heights, OH
April 6-8, 2018

We seek submissions for papers on any aspect of Foucault’s work, as well as studies, critiques, and applications of Foucauldian thinking.

Paper submissions require an abstract of no more than 750 words. All submissions should be formatted as a “.doc” or “.docx” attachment, prepared for anonymous review, and sent via email to the attention of program committee chair Joanna Crosby (foucault.circle@ gmail.com) on or before December 14, 2017. Indicate “Foucault Circle submission” in the subject heading. Program decisions will be announced during the week of January 15, 2018.

This year’s meeting will include a discussion session on Foucault’s 1971 lecture on the work of Manet, Manet and the Object of Painting. The meeting will begin Friday afternoon with a guided tour at the Cleveland Museum of Art focusing on Manet’s work. Morning and afternoon paper sessions will be held on Saturday, followed by a business meeting and dinner. The conference will conclude with paper sessions on Sunday morning. Presenters will have approximately 40 minutes for paper presentation and discussion combined; papers should be a maximum of 3500 words (20-25 minutes reading time).

Logistical information about lodging, transportation, and other arrangements will be available after the program has been announced.

For more information about the Foucault Circle, please see our website:
http://www.foucaultcircle.org
or contact our Coordinator, Ed McGushin:
emcgushin@stonehill.edu

Funding for the 2018 meeting of the Foucault Circle is being provided by
the Don Shula Chair in Philosophy.

Read Full Post »

APPEL À CONTRIBUTIONS / CALL FOR PAPERS

3èmes journées d’études sur l’Épistémologie Historique
3rd Workshop on Historical Epistemology
Pour une épistémologie historique des transformations techniques
For an Historical Epistemology of Technical Transformations

18-19-20 mai 2017
Ecole doctorale de Philosophie ED 280, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Institut des sciences Juridique & Philosophique de la Sorbonne – UMR 8130
Centre de Philosophie Contemporaine de la Sorbonne, Equipe EXeCO

PDF

***

[English below]

Ces troisièmes journées d’études seront consacrées à la place des techniques dans les études d’épistémologie historique. Il s’agira d’explorer cette thématique d’un point de vue méthodologique et d’approfondir différents cas d’étude de transformations techniques et technologiques.

La question des techniques est de première importance pour l’épistémologie historique, entendue au sens large: bien qu’elle soit souvent présentée comme une histoire purement conceptuelle, l’étude de techniques y a occupé une place centrale dans l’enquête sur le déroulement concret des pratiques scientifiques. Le rapport entre sciences et techniques a été ainsi largement problématisé, en insistant souvent sur la primauté du moment technique par rapport à la systématisation théorique.

A cet égard, ces journées permettront de discuter des recherches en cours sur différentes transformations techniques et technologiques dans les domaines les plus variées: sciences médicales et biologiques, sociales, physiques ou tout autre champ disciplinaire où les chercheurs se sont servis de la “boîte à outils” de l’épistémologie historique. Nous attendons donc un ensemble de contributions caractérisées par des approches différentes, capables d’aborder le sujet proposé dans sa généralité, notamment selon les axes définis dans les deux sections suivantes:

I. Les épistémologues historiques face aux techniques L’épistémologie française a repensé les techniques avec une certaine précocité par rapport à la philosophie des sciences anglo-saxonne, qui, jusqu’aux années 1980, est restée liée au programme post-positiviste de la priorité de la théorie sur l’observation et l’expérimentation. Bachelard, Koyré, Canguilhem, Foucault, dans leurs analyses de la connaissance scientifique, ont assignée des rôles spécifiques aux techniques. C’est Hacking qui, dans la phase contemporaine et anglophone de l’épistémologie historique, a contribué à rétablir la centralité du “style du laboratoire” et des manières d’intervenir dans le monde par rapport aux manières de le concevoir. Dans son sillage, d’autres auteurs, comme L. Daston, P. Galison et H.-J. Rheinberger ont accordé une grande attention à l’histoire matérielle et au rôle que les instruments et les appareils jouent dans la production du savoir scientifique. Qu’a changé la prise en compte des techniques? Comment cette prise en compte a-t-elle elle-même pu évoluer au fil des temps?

II. Histoire des techniques, histoire des concepts Au niveau méthodologique, nous souhaiterions également recevoir des contributions traitant des conceptions du rapport entre techniques et théorie dans l’histoire des sciences et, plus généralement, sur le rôle des techniques dans le processus de développement scientifique. De ce point de vue, une attention particulière sera donné aux interventions qui proposent de discuter l’originalité de l’épistémologie historique vis-à-vis d’autres approches méthodologiques d’étude des sciences, notamment les nombreuses études sociales des sciences et des technologies (STS), mais aussi par rapport à d’autres traditions de pensée philosophiques qui ont traité la même question, comme la phénoménologie (Husserl, Merleau-Ponty), l’anthropologie philosophique (Gehlen, Marquard), l’herméneutique (Nancy), la philosophie sociale (Ellul), etc.

Les propositions d’interventions (500 mots, plus une présentation courte du candidat) sont à nous faire parvenir, avant le 3 février 2017 (date de réponse le 27 février), en format word ou pdf à epistemologiehistorique@gmail.com. Les deux langues de la rencontre seront le français et l’anglais.

[English]

The 3rd Edition of this Workshop is dedicated to the role of techniques within the field of Historical Epistemology (HEP). This topic will be developed from a methodological point of view and different case studies involving technical and technological transformations will be taken into account.

The problem of techniques is a crucial matter for HEP, broadly understood: although it is chiefly understood as a conceptual history, HEP has systematically drawn from the study of techniques for inquiring about the concrete development of scientific practices. Moreover, the connection between sciences and techniques has been widely discussed by many, if not all, of the practitioners of HEP, often with the result of highlighting the primacy of the technical, experimental and productive moments over the theoretical and speculative ones.

With this in mind, the workshop will involve discussion of on-going researches about different technical and technological transformations in many different fields: the medical and the social sciences, biology, physics and other disciplines in which the researchers have borrowed from HEP’s toolbox. We expect contributions from different approaches in order to address the proposed topic in its generality, in particular according to the two following axes:

I. Historical epistemologists facing techniques Compared to Anglo-Saxon philosophy of science, which, until the 1980s, had maintained a strong link to a post-positivist programme granting primacy to theories over observation and experimentation, French epistemology reassessed the role of techniques with a certain precocity. In their analyses of scientific knowledge, Bachelard, Koyré, Canguilhem and Foucault assigned to techniques a particular role. In the contemporary moment of HEP it is I. Hacking who has decisively contributed to reestablish the centrality of the “laboratory style” and of the ways to intervene in the world with respect to the ways to conceive it. In his wake, other authors, like L. Daston, P. Galison and H.-J. Rheinberger have given full attention to the material history and to the role instruments and apparatuses play in the production of scientific knowledge. What did the taking into account of techniques change? How did this consideration itself evolve over time?

II. History of techniques, history of concepts On the methodological level, we welcome proposals dealing with the relationship between techniques and theories within the history of science and, more generally, on the role techniques have in the processes of scientific development. Under this light, particular attention will be given to those interventions which will envisage to discuss the originality of HEP with respect to other epistemological approaches within science studies, i.e. the science, technology and society studies (STS), but also the relation to other philosophical traditions which have dealt with the same questions, such as phenomenology (Husserl, Merleau-Ponty), anthropology (Gehlen, Marquard), hermeneutics (Nancy), social philosophy (Ellul), etc.

Proposals (500 words plus a short presentation of the candidate) must be sent by February 3rd, 2017 (notification of acceptance or refusal by February 27th), in word or pdf formats, to epistemologiehistorique@gmail.com. The languages of the workshop will be French and English.

Dates importantes / Important dates
Limite de proposition d’interventions / Application deadline: February 3rd 2017
Réponse / Notification of acceptance: February 27th 2017
Remise de textes / Text submission: May 6th 2017
Journées d’études / Workshop days: May 18-19-20 2017

Comité scientifique / Scientific committee
Christian BONNET, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Jean-François BRAUNSTEIN, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Arnold I. DAVIDSON, University of Chicago.
Pierre WAGNER, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

Comité d’organisation / Organizing committee
Ivan MOYA DIEZ, Laurent LOISON, Matteo VAGELLI (coordinateurs)
Tiago ALMEIDA, Marcos CAMOLEZI, Wenbo LIANG, Gabriele VISSIO

Read Full Post »

CALL FOR PAPERS

The seventeenth annual meeting of the Foucault Circle

Los Angeles, California
March 23-25, 2017
(hosted by Loyola Marymount University)

We invite individual papers on any aspect of Foucault’s work. Studies, critiques, and applications of Foucauldian thinking are all welcome. We will aim for a diversity of topics and perspectives.

Abstracts should be prepared for anonymous review, and are to be submitted to the program committee chair, Nicole Ridgway, by email (ridgwayn@uwm.edu) on/before Friday, December 9, 2016. Please indicate “Foucault Circle submission” in the subject heading, and include the abstract as a “.docx” attachment.

Individual paper submissions require an abstract of no more than 750 words.
Program decisions will be announced in December.

Each speaker will have approximately 35 minutes for paper presentation and discussion combined—papers should be a maximum of 3000 words (15-20 minutes reading time). In addition to paper sessions, the conference will also feature a screening and discussion of Sur les toits, a documentary film on the 1970s prison revolts in France. This session will be open to all participants.

Logistical information about lodging, transportation, and other arrangements will be available after the program has been announced.

For more information about the Foucault Circle, please see our website

Read Full Post »

CALL FOR PAPERS

The seventeenth annual meeting of the Foucault Circle

Los Angeles, California
March 23-25, 2017
(hosted by Loyola Marymount University)

We invite individual papers on any aspect of Foucault’s work. Studies, critiques, and applications of Foucauldian thinking are all welcome. We will aim for a diversity of topics and perspectives.

Abstracts should be prepared for anonymous review, and are to be submitted to the program committee chair, Nicole Ridgway, by email (ridgwayn@uwm.edu) on/before Friday, Nov. 18, 2016. Please indicate “Foucault Circle submission” in the subject heading, and include the abstract as a “.docx” attachment.
Individual paper submissions require an abstract of no more than 750 words.
Program decisions will be announced in December.

Each speaker will have approximately 35 minutes for paper presentation and discussion combined—papers should be a maximum of 3000 words (15-20 minutes reading time). In addition to paper sessions, the conference will also feature a screening and discussion of Sur les toits, a documentary film on the 1970s prison revolts in France. This session will be open to all participants.

Logistical information about lodging, transportation, and other arrangements will be available after the program has been announced.

For more information about the Foucault Circle, please see our website:

Read Full Post »

CALL FOR PAPERS

International Conference

GOVERNMENT OF SELF, GOVERNMENT OF OTHERS

Ethical and political questions in the late Foucault

IFILNOVA / EPLab, Lisbon, 6th-7th March 2017

Organizers

Marta Faustino, Gianfranco Ferraro, Luís de Sousa

The Laboratory of Ethics and Political Philosophy of IFILNOVA invites submissions for its international conference “Government of Self, Government of Others. Ethical and Political Questions in the Late Foucault”, to be held at the New University of Lisbon, on the 6th-7th of March, 2017.

Michel Foucault’s last lecture series at Collège de France constitute a unity that testifies a shift in his thought. This shift deepens and expands the course of his preceding works concerning the genealogy of subjectivity, while, at the same time, adding to it a significant ethical and political dimension. Foucault returns to the practices of the self in antiquity and looks at the birth of the techniques of truth that allow us to understand how the Western subject has developed from the creation of particular relationships with its own body and other subjectivities. At the same time, these courses put in evidence the relationship between truth and power which lies at the core of Western forms of power and even Western democracy, thus inciting us to question our current political environment and face some political challenges of our time. Finally, Foucault’s concern in these last years with the technologies of ethical self-formation through what he calls “care of the self” sheds new light on his philosophical endeavor as a whole and situates his reflections at the center of contemporaneous moral debates.

On the occasion of the 35th anniversary of The Hermeneutics of the Subject (1981-1982) and celebrating the conclusion of the publication of all the lecture courses from the 1980s – from On the Government of the Living (1979-1980) to The Courage of Truth (1984) -, this conference aims to (re)launch the critical debate on the last stage of Foucault’s thought, evaluating in what way and to which extent the perspectives that Foucault offers in this period might help us to unravel modernity and also give us tools to ethically and politically understand and transform our present.

We accept proposals on any of Foucault’s lecture courses from the 1980s or any interrelated aspect of the last period of his thought. The dialogue with other authors from the philosophical, sociological or political tradition is strongly encouraged. Possible topics include, but are not restricted to:

  • Genealogy of subjectivity
  • Hermeneutics and truth
  • Care of the self and aesthetics of existence
  • Governmentality
  • Technologies of power and subjectivation
  • Will to truth and parrhesia
  • Knowledge and identity
  • Ethics and practices of freedom
  • Asceticism and philosophy
  • Foucault’s actuality

We welcome submissions from doctoral students, early career researchers or established academics. Paper proposals of 300 to 500 words, accompanied by a short biography (150 words), should be submitted (in either English, French or Portuguese) to ciclo.foucault@gmail.com by the 30th of November of 2016. Notifications of acceptance will be given by the 15th of December of 2016.

For further information, please contact ciclo.foucault@gmail.com.

Read Full Post »

The 2016 conference of the Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy (ASCP) will take place at Deakin University’s Burwood Campus, December 7-9 2016.

The ASCP aims to provide a broad intellectual forum for academics and postgraduates working in the European philosophical tradition. Its annual conference is the largest event devoted to European philosophy in Australasia.

The conference will feature a number of curated streams, including ‘Philosophies of Self-Formation’, ‘Continental Philosophy and Other Traditions’, ‘Phenomenologies of Oppression’, ‘Law and Continental Philosophy’, ‘Philosophy and Creative Practice’ and ‘Politics and Technology’.

Inquiries can be addressed to s.bowden@deakin.edu.au. Please use ‘ASCP2016’ in the subject line.

The keynote speakers are Penelope Deutscher (Northwestern), John Lippitt (Hertfordshire), Anne Sauvagnargues (Paris Ouest) and John Sellars (King’s College London).


Streams

1. Philosophies of Self-Formation – curated by Matthew Sharpe (matthew.sharpe@deakin.edu.au)

The later work of Michel Foucault announced a turn towards classical philosophical conceptions of self-formation. Alongside work by Dumanski, Sellars, Voelke and others influenced by Pierre and Ilsetraut Hadot, Foucault’s later works point to an alternative understanding of the history of philosophy, paying renewed attention to the Hellenistic, Roman and early modern periods downplayed or overlooked in many 19th and 20th century histories. This stream will involve papers examining the history of the metaphilosophical conceptions of philosophy as a way of life, or as therapeutic, or as interested in paideia or self-formation, which reached its peaks during these periods. Papers are invited on the Stoics, Epicureans, Cicero, the sceptics, Petrarch and the renaissance philosophers, Montaigne and the new Pyrrhonists, the founders of the modern scientific project(s), the philosophes, Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche … or other figures speaking to this theme.

6. Law and Philosophy – curated by John Morss and Luca Siliquini-Cinelli (john.morss@deakin.edu.au, l.siliquinicinelli@deakin.edu.au)

What is sovereignty? What is a legal right or a legal obligation? What is a nation? What, if anything, is a human right, the Rule of Law, Global Justice? Can law recognise the plural: can a legal cosmopolitanism transcend identity politics? In addressing such questions contemporary legal philosophy and jurisprudence are dominated by English-speaking, Anglo-American traditions in philosophy. Analytic traditions of a conservative stripe, themselves a narrow representation of English-speaking philosophical discourse, exert near-exclusive control on jurisprudential debate. Cultural hegemony is one reason for this but the lack of engagement between legal theorists and Continental philosophies is another. This stream hopes to address this gap by foregrounding the contributions and challenges to legal theory that are presented by writers such as Agamben, Arendt, Deleuze, Derrida, Foucault, Ranciere, Zizek. In terms of non-Anglo jurisprudence, while already well mined, the writings of Schmitt and of Kelsen may yet have more to yield to these debates. Philosophy of law is too important to ignore the wide variety of perspectives offered by Continental thought.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: