Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Workshops’ Category

RENCONTRE DOCTORALE DU CENTRE MICHEL FOUCAULT
2/3/4 mai 2012.
IMEC. Caen, France

L’Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault propose pour la quatrième année consécutive une école doctorale visant à réunir les doctorants travaillant sur, avec et autour de la pensée de Michel Foucault.

L’objectif est, comme les années précédentes de mettre en relation, le plus agréablement possible et de manière assez informelle, les jeunes chercheurs afin de constituer un réseau de travail national et international.

Cette rencontre aura lieu 2, 3, 4 mai 2012 à l’IMEC, à l’Abbaye d’Ardenne à Caen (avec un départ de Paris le mercredi 2 mai au soir et retour le vendredi 4 mai en fin de journée).

Les frais de séjour sur place et les billets Paris-Caen-Paris seront offerts aux intervenants par l’Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault.
Pour que les échanges puissent être les plus féconds possibles – et compte tenu des capacités d’accueil de l’Abbaye – nous limitons le nombre de participants, ce qui impliquera nécessairement un choix de notre part.

Les doctorants ayant participé les années passées aux rencontres pourront bien entendu décider d’y assister, mais la priorité sera donnée aux nouveaux intervenants et aux doctorants en 2eme et 3eme année de thèse.

Les propositions d’intervention (une page maximum), portant soit sur une question particulière de votre travail de thèse, soit sur un problème méthodologique précis, devront nous être envoyées, avec un CV, avant le 15 février 2012.

En fonction des demandes, nous établirons et diffuserons un programme début Mars. N’hésitez pas à nous contacter pour toute question.

Très cordialement, Philippe Artières, Jean-François Bert, Luca Paltrinieri Mathieu Potte-Bonneville, Judith Revel, Ferhat Taylan

Contact :
Luca Paltrinieri : l.paltrinieri@gmail.com
Ferhat Taylan : ferhattaylan@gmail.com

Info via le Portail Michel Foucault

Read Full Post »

From Continental Philosophy

EPTC Incubator Workshop—Philosophy and/as Biopolitics

The Society for Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture (EPTC) is looking for submissions for the Second ETPC Incubator. This event will be a collaborative workshop with presentations of work-in-progress as well as paper presentations on this year’s theme: Philosophy and/as Biopolitics.

Some of the most important thinkers from the past century and many of the most innovative philosophers working today have been focused on the rather diffuse question of biopolitics. While the very meaning of this term may remain open to interpretation, it is nevertheless becoming one of the most important philosophical horizons moving into the twenty-first century. What is biopolitics? Looking back on the past century, why is it possible to count so many philosophers as biopolitical thinkers? Which issues and problems can biopolitics address? And what does the turn to biopolitics mean for philosophy as it advances into the next millennium?

Discussion may involve theoretical questions or applied work. Possible figures for consideration include Foucault, Agamben, Arendt, Derrida, Deleuze, Hardt, Negri, Haraway, Nancy, Butler, Schmitt, Rancière, Habermas, Zizek, Grosz, and Nikolas Rose.

This workshop lets presenters bring problems, questions, and concerns about work-in-progress for discussion in a roundtable setting. It is appropriate to bring a project in its nascent stages, specific passages of a work that are causing difficulties or trouble for the author, or work that is at a crossroad and requires more reflection before it can advance. Suitable projects may include journal articles, book chapters, conference papers, lectures, or perhaps doctoral thesis work. Our aim is to incubate and nurture these projects so participants can take them to the next level. The WIP sessions will be bookended by two formal paper presentations to situate and inspire the conversation.

The workshop will be conducted during EPTC’s annual meeting at Canadian Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences, which will be held May 29 –June 1, 2012 in Waterloo, ON.

We seek two types of work:

i) Work in Progress

- 500-750 word proposal outlining the project you would present at the workshop

- 10-15 minute presentation will be followed by 30-minute roundtable discussion

ii) Conference papers

- 4500 word maximum, plus 150-word abstract

- 30 minute paper will be followed by a brief commentary and 20-minute discussion period

** Please prepare submissions for anonymous review in Word format. On a separate sheet include the title of project, author name, institutional affiliation, and contact information.

Note that the workshop will be open so that all conference delegates can take part. Short précis (approx. 500 words) prepared by participants will be made available on the EPTC/TCEP web site prior to the event. It is preferred that participants discuss their projects extemporaneously so conversation remains colloquial and collegial.

Deadline: January 15, 2012

Submissions and/or questions should be sent to Bronwyn Singleton (bronwynsingleton@gmail.com)

Read Full Post »

Epistemologies of the Political, the Global and the International

A workshop to reflect collectively on the ways we know the ‘factual’ world we research.

For further info see this site

Organised by the Emerging Securities Research Unit, Keele University and co-sponsored by the BISA Poststructuralist Politics Working Group

Keynote speaker: Prof Michael Shapiro, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Monday 7 November 2011
Keele University, Claus Moser Building, 9:30 – 5:00

Rationale
Orders of the real are authoritative ways of imagining the world. They imply specific sets of beliefs, attitudes, practices, and discourses that taken together constitute regimes of truth around which decisions on what is to be taken as valid are made. Orders of the real presuppose understandings of how the world is known, the relations that constitute the regimes upon which knowledge is produced, and the representations and assumptions about the problem of political existence. Although within a positivist tradition of science they have been approached from the realm of ‘the empirical’ and observed through methods that seek to reduce them to objective and measurable facts, they are far more problematic than that. As continental thinkers such as Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, Nancy, and many others have demonstrated, they enshrine complex relations of power, that include, and transcend, what has been known through and after Foucault’s work as power/knowledge.

Orders of the real constitute epistemological problems. They can be observed as sites from which to question deep assumptions that determine the outcomes of research. They can also be explored to make explicit the conditions of possibility and operability of systems of thought upon which modern technologies of governance depend. They can also be used to interrogate problems that in principle appear buried in time, such as various relationships between the modern and the secular as well as the modern and the uncertain, within technologies and practices of government and rule.

The Emerging Securities Unit was created in 2009 to support research on novel forms of revealing the possibility of being political. Through this workshop we intend to offer a space for critical reflection on the epistemological implications of researching the political, the global, and the international as sites of representation of orders of the real.

Format
The workshop is organised in the form of interventions to a general debate. We are calling for participants who wish to reflect publicly on the epistemological implications of their past, current, and future research projects. We invite abstracts on these interventions of no more than 300 words drawing on, but not exclusively, the following questions:

· How can relationships between ontologies and epistemologies be made productive in revealing the possibilities of being political?

· What does researching the epistemologies of the political, the global, and the international offer in terms of understanding the realm of the empirical?

· What might a sceptical epistemology look like if traditional approaches to power/knowledge are to be resisted?

· Can epistemologies be secured in an attempt to secure orders of governance?

Please send abstracts to Corey Walker Mortimer (c.b.walker-mortimer@ilpj.keele.ac.uk) by the 29th of July 2011

Accepted participants will be asked to write a 1000-word brief on their intervention to be included on a report of the workshop which will be hosted at the Emerging Securities Research Group website.

Costs of participation: There are no fees for this workshop. However, participants will have to fund their own travel/accommodation/subsistence.

Organisers:
Luis Lobo-Guerrero (l.lobo-guerrero@intr.keele.ac.uk), supported by Peter Adey (p.adey@esci.keele.ac.u), and Barry Ryan (b.j.ryan@intr.keele.ac.uk), on behalf of the Emerging Securities Unit.

Event coordinator: Corey Walker Mortimer (c.b.walker-mortimer@ilpj.keele.ac.uk)

Read Full Post »

MANCHESTER Workshops in Political Theory 2011
31 August – 2 September 2011

Call for Papers – Ontology and Politics Workshop

Convenors: Paul Rekret (Queen Mary), Simon Choat (Kingston), Clayton Chin (Queen Mary)

Description
Despite its pervasiveness, the question of the relation between ontology and politics continues to be a crucial one for Continental philosophy. While the place and status of the question of being in the realm of the political has occupied much of social theory in the past twenty or thirty years, we remain no closer to drawing any common ground on these themes. Post-structuralist or post-foundational political thought has insisted on the inherent contingency of any political ontology and has, from this notion, sought to draw out a framework for an emancipatory politics grounded in the concepts of difference and otherness.

However, such a stance finds itself increasingly challenged today. On the one hand, thinkers such as Alain Badiou and Jacques Ranciere call for the need to think a politics grounded in a conception of universality rather than alterity, while on the other hand, so-called speculative realism more fundamentally challenges the very notion of ontology as it has been conceived by the majority of Continental thinkers in recent decades.

This panel aims to explore the intersections of politics and ontology and the resulting implications for thinking both the political and the philosophical.

We invite papers addressing the following and any other related themes:

-Is there a place for reflection on ontology in the theorisation and study of politics?

-Is there a necessary transitivity between the ontological and the political? How should this relation be conceived?

-Is there a necessarily leftist or emancipatory ontology?

-Should the politics which has generally been thought to follow from post-foundational or post-structuralist ontologies be re-evaluated in light of recent critiques?

-Does a new and different relation between ontology and politics follow from recent speculative materialist ontologies?

If you would like to present a paper at this workshop, please submit an abstract of 300-500 words (or a full paper to p.rekret@qmul.ac.uk or S.Choat@kingston.ac.uk by 15 June 2011.

Read Full Post »

First two-day workshop of the CIBB Project (‘Contemporary Issues in Bioethics and Biopolitics’)

‘The Normal and the Pathological’

27th and 28th September 2011
MS.05 (second floor) Zeeman Building, The University of Warwick.

Please note that all the papers will be delivered in English.

All welcome. Free registration at normalpathological@gmail.com

Confirmed speakers: Jean-Claude Dumoncel, Robert Bernasconi, Bill Fulford, Frederic Worms, Julien Pieron, Florence Caeymaex, Guillaume Leblanc, John Protevi, Charles T.Wolfe and Giuseppe Bianco

From a philosophical perspective, the problem of illness can be seen to emerge from the tension between the subjective (a life which is mine) and objective dimensions of life. On the one hand, illness is irreducible to an objective fact, as if independent of the subjectivity which it affects; on the other hand, it is irreducible to a mere signification, and cannot be understood independently of its inscription within a living organism, its relation to an environment, and even the effort, on the part of other living beings, to know and treat it. Illness is a qualitative and individual experience that takes place within human life itself. Once we recognise the specificity of illness in those terms, can we not arrive at an understanding of life, and the normal, on the basis of the pathological, and not as what is simply threatened and, ultimately, annihilated by it? Similarly, should medicine not recognize in care (and its latin etymology cura) the ethical implications of the internal tension of life and not isolate the pathology from the subjectivity in which it is rooted?

Far from being of interest only to biology and medicine, the question of the normal and the pathological implicates our perception of life as a whole, in all its forms. Pathology is at the source of all questioning concerned with life. It’s only on the basis of suffering and distress, which are the signs of illness, that every question regarding life, or what living human beings consider normal at a given stage of their history, and the conditions under which such a state can be maintained, becomes possible. “Health is life in the silence of the organs,” wrote Leriche. This means that all discourse of life on life spring from that obscure moment when, confronted with an obstacle, life “speaks” or seeks to speak. To the extent that our purpose is to ask about life, we need to begin by asking about life’s relation to the pathological, and the epistemological, ethical and political implications of such a relation.

After the classical contributions of Canguilhem and Foucault, we are convinced that it is possible, and indeed necessary, to extend and adapt the reflection of the philosophy of pathology in the light of the new challenges emerging from the evolution of society and the life sciences. In the era of bio-power, the norms have become independent of the normative power of the human being, determining its comportments and excluding those considered pathological. To what extent is it possible to emphasise and promote the normative activity of human life in the face of a system that declares in advance, and down to the most minute details, what is normal? What paradigm of normality and health can we develop as an alternative to auto-immunisation, this disease caused by the excess of concern for health? What critical space is left, or can be generated, in an epoch in which the life sciences make it possible for the human being to intervene on itself, on other living beings, and determine their identity? Is it still possible to develop a normative critique that would not be rooted in the naturalistic paradigm?

Read Full Post »

Seminario de actualización
La Biopolítica en el mundo actual. Reflexiones sobre el “efecto Foucault”

Salón de Grados. Facultad de Filosofía. Campus de Guajara.
Universidad de La Laguna (Tenerife).

PROGRAMACIÓN:
Martes 12 abril 2011
17.30 horas ‐ Presentación del Seminario. Intervendrán: un representante del Cabildo Insular de Tenerife, Dra. Ángela Sierra González (Decana de la Facultad de Filosofía) y D. Domingo Fernández Agis (Coordinador).
18 horas ‐ Profesora Dra. Ángela Sierra González (ULL‐Facultad de Filosofía). Ponencia: “Cuerpo y terror”. Debate.

Miércoles 13 abril 2011
17.30 horas ‐ Taller de textos. Debate.
19.30 horas ‐ Taller de textos. Debate.

Jueves 14 abril 2011
17.30 horas ‐ Profesor Dr. Domingo Fernández Agis (ULL‐Facultad de Filosofía). Ponencia: “Bioética y biopolítica en el pensamiento de Michel Foucault”. Debate.
19.30 horas ‐ Profesor Dr. José Manuel de Cózar Escalante (ULL‐Facultad de Filosofía). Ponencia: “Nanotecnología y bioética”. Debate.

Viernes 15 abril 2011
17.30 horas ‐ Dr. Daniele Lorenzini (Université Paris‐Est Créteil). Ponencia: “Mostrar una vida. Foucault y la (bio)política de la visibilidad”. Debate.
19.30 horas ‐ Profesor Dr. Vincenzo Sorrentino (Università degli Studi di Perugia). Ponencia: “Biopolítica y libertad”. Debate.

Informaciones: Domingo Fernández Agis, dferagi@ull.es

Read Full Post »

Patrice Maniglier et Dork Zabunyan, Foucault va au cinéma., Montrouge: Editions Bayard, Collection La logique des images, 2011

A workshop on 11 February 2011 and a subsequent cinema program in association with the book took place in Nice. See here for a video of the program.

See also this press release

You can can also listen to a program (podcast) with the authors on France Culture.

Review in Le Monde

Des textes réunis pour la première fois.

Voici réunis pour la première fois les textes de Michel Foucault sur le cinéma grâce à Dork Zabunyan et Patrice Maniglier qui les présentent et les analysent. On peut s’étonner que cette facette de l’œuvre de Michel Foucault n’est jamais fait l’objet d’un livre jusque là tant ses ouvrages sont commentés et débattus aujourd’hui. Une réflexion inédite sur sa relation au cinéma .

Penser autrement le cinéma

Ses travaux sur la prison, l’hôpital, la sexualité répondaient à son désir de « penser autrement » et notamment de faire de l’histoire autrement, en s’attachant à tous ces micro-procédures dont nous ne sommes pas conscients mais qui décident certains des changements les plus profonds. Justement, et c’est ce que démontrent ici les philosophes Dork Zabunyan et Patrice Maniglier, le cinéma est un lieu où ces micro-changements inconscients peuvent être vus. La relation de la pensée de Foucault au cinéma est donc loin d’être marginale, comme l’apport de cet ouvrage à la réception de son œuvre.

Dork Zabunyan est philosophe, maître de conférence à l’université de Lille 3. Il est l’auteur de Gilles Deleuze. Voir, parler, penser au risque du cinéma (Presses de la Sorbonne nouvelle) et collabore à de nombreuses revues (Critique, Art Press, Trafic, Vacarme…)

Patrice Maniglier enseigne la philosophie française du vingtième siècle, à l’université d’Essex en angleterre. Il est notamment l’auteur de La perspective du diable (Actes Sud), Antimanuel d’éducation sexuelle (avec Marcella Iacub, Bréal), La vie énigmatique des signes (Leo Scheer).

Added 19 August 2012
This book is currently being translated into English by Clare O’Farrell and will be published by Columbia University Press. The English edition will include the full versions of all ten of Foucault’s articles and interviews relating to film and an additional chapter by the translator. The book in French contains extracts from 9 of Foucault’s articles, not the full versions.

Read Full Post »

Ecole doctorale : 27/28/29 avril 2011. IMEC. Caen

L’Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault propose, pour la troisième année consécutive, avec l’aide de la Fondation de France une école doctorale visant à réunir les doctorants travaillant sur, avec et autour de la pensée de Michel Foucault.

L’objectif est, comme les années précédentes de mettre en relation, le plus agréablement possible et de manière assez informelle, les jeunes chercheurs afin de constituer un réseau de travail national et international.

Cette rencontre aura lieu les 27, le 28 et le 29 avril 2011 à l’IMEC, à l’abbaye d’Ardenne à Caen (avec une arrivée l’après-midi du premier jour et un départ le 29 en fin de journée).

Les frais de séjour sur place et les billets Paris-Caen-Paris seront offerts aux intervenants par l’Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault.

Pour que les échanges puissent être les plus féconds possibles – et compte tenu des capacités d’accueil de l’abbaye – nous limitons le nombre de participants, ce qui impliquera nécessairement un choix de notre part.

Les doctorants ayant participé les années passées aux journées pourront bien entendu décider d’y assister, mais la priorité sera donnée aux nouveaux intervenants et à ceux qui, les années précédentes n’avaient pu être choisis.

Les propositions d’intervention (une page maximum), portant soit sur une question particulière de votre travail de thèse, soit sur un problème méthodologique précis, devront nous être envoyées avant le 1er février 2011.
En fonction des demandes, nous établirons et diffuserons un programme courant février.

N’hésitez pas à nous contacter pour toute question.

Très cordialement,

Philippe Artières, Jean-François Bert, Luca Paltrinieri, Mathieu Potte-Bonneville, Judith Revel, Ferhat Taylan

Contact :
Luca Paltrinieri : l.paltrinieri@gmail.com

Read Full Post »

A workshop on Foucault and Habermas is being convened in the context of the MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory, to be held between 31 August and 2 September 2011 at the University of Manchester.

Papers are invited on any aspect of the social and political thought of Foucault, Habermas, the Foucault/Habermas debate and the Habermas/Rawls debate.

Please submit an abstract to Dr. Evangelia Sembou, Convenor, Political Thought Specialist Group of the PSA
evangelia.sembou@hotmail.com by 15 January 2011.
Please also submit an abbreviated CV. Completed papers should be submitted by 29 July 2011.

Information about the conference can be found at
http://manceptworkshops.wordpress.com

Read Full Post »

ESRC Seminar Series on Contemporary Biopolitical Security Fourth workshop:

Problematising Danger

Co-sponsored by the Biopolitics of Security Network,
the Emerging Securities Research Unit @ Keele University
and the Centre for International Relations, War Studies Department, King’s
College London

21-22 February 2011
The River Room, King’s College London, Strand Campus

Keynote speaker:
Professor Marieke de Goede
Professor of Politics, with a focus on Europe in a Global Order, at the Department of Politics of the University of Amsterdam

Call for interventions
‘There is no liberalism without a culture of danger.’ (Foucault, 2008: 67)

FOUCAULT, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979,Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Threats and risks have become the preferred categories for imagining contemporary security. Practices such as defence, border control and the surveillance of populations, insurance, risk profiling to identify suspicious subjects, and risk assessments to protect objects and systems such as critical infrastructure, rely heavily on well-established paradigms of security. Discourses and practices of threats and risks, with their allied technologies of measurement and calculation, however, relate to the wider problem of danger and its allied concept of ‘uncertainty’. Thinking ‘danger’ relates to understandings of uncertainties, otherness of being, and spaces and environments of protection in excess of those accounted for in the language and metrics of discourses of threats and risks.

What happens, then, if the analysis of security resorts to understandings of ‘danger’, ‘dangerousness’, and processes of ‘endangerment’? Is it possible to think security by referring ideas of danger to understandings of life, livelihoods and lifestyles, instead of ready-made ‘objects’ of security such as sovereignty, territory, the nation-state, citizens, borders, and sociological categories such as class and gender? Is it possible to think security in relation to danger away from utilitarian economic categories such as cost-benefit analysis, risk calculus, and rational choice? The workshop aims to explore these questions and to challenge participants to wonder if current policy security priorities such as terrorism, climate change, weapons proliferation, resilience and migration can be thought in relation to ‘danger’ outside discourses of threats and risks.

In the first three workshops of this seminar series we began to explore an agenda for contemporary biopolitical security research around problems such as mobilities and circulations, resilience, values and processes of valuations in relation to the technologies through which lifestyles and livelihoods are treated as referents of security. In this fourth workshop we intend to spark a conversation around the implications of thinking dangerousness in relation to security and life.

The workshop welcomes interventions from scholars working on any area of security and risk and invites them to reflect on the following questions:

* How are ideas of danger constituted? What forms of ‘data’, ‘information’, and ‘knowledge’ are involved in constituting a dangerous subject or a dangerous environment?
* What are the preconditions for understanding endangerment and how do they question the ‘new security challenges’ of for example, terrorism (and cyber-terrorism), proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, climate change, and health pandemics?
* Can discourses and practices of security be different if reflections on the consequences of endangerment are advanced?

Interventions do not necessarily need to be in the form of a pre-written paper although we would welcome written contributions. We invite emerging and established researchers on the wider field of security studies to reflect on their own work based on the questions noted above. PhD contributions are very welcome.

Please send a 200-300 word abstract of your proposed intervention for the debate to our workshop coordinators (noted below) no later than the 30th of November 2010.

Please include your affiliation and contact details in the abstract. Acceptance of contributions will be confirmed by email on the week commencing the 6th of December.

Funding: Travel and accommodation expenses will be covered for contributors and a limited number of participants based in the UK (according to ESRC rules). If you are a PhD student and want to participate without an intervention, please express your interest to the workshop coordinators as early as possible. Some funds might be available to facilitate your attendance.

Workshop coordinators:
Philip Slann (p.a.slann@ilpj.keele.ac.uk)
Corey Walker-Mortimer (c.b.walker-mortimer@ilpj.keele.ac.uk )

Event organisers:
Dr Luis Lobo-Guerrero (Visiting Research Fellow, King’s College London; and
Lecturer in International Relations, Keele University), and Professor

Vivienne Jabri (Professor of International Politics and Director of the
Centre for International Relations at King’s College London)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,091 other followers

%d bloggers like this: